Uh-oh!
Maybe he was absent when the teacher was giving a lesson on plural nouns? Well at least he got the fruits part right. :)
Photos
Recent Comments
May You Rest in Peace, Cory Aquino
melancolia i agree in everything that you have written here except on one thing: cory didn’t lead the people to...
The Great Philippine Book Blockade of 2009
digitalron I remember boarding the Doulos way back in 2002… and then spending six or seven hours wandering...
Manila among cheapest parking rates in Asia
urbanodelacruz I say RAISE the parking rates. Econ 11, right? Tax what you want to discourage. Here’s the...
Manila Bay, Again
Migs Bassig Hi Udayan. Yes, Manila remains a crowded place, what with even more and bigger malls. But the sunset will...
Udayan Tripathi I went to Manila in 1997 and remember very little of, patches of crowded city life and shopping at...
Authors
Categories
Blogroll
Log in / Register
Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.
it is fruit and vegetables (no s after fruit)
AFAIK, isn’t it supposed to be singular for both fruit and vegetable? like, ‘drug dealer’ not ‘drugs dealer’ or ’stock broker’ not ’stocks broker’. Since you syntactically use ‘fruit and vegetable’ as an adjective. Or I could be wrong. Tagalugin nalang nya yan! hahaha